The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association is repeating its call for a fit-for-purpose CO2 regulation for trucks and buses.
Despite commitment to decarbonisation and record investment levels in zero-emission vehicles by manufacturers, the organisation said proposed targets remain overly ambitious without the backing of robust enabling conditions.
Reacting to the European Parliament’s environment committee position, European truck and bus manufacturers voiced concern that targets may express ambition on paper, but are “unachievable in reality”.
“Decarbonising heavy-duty transport is not a solo endeavour,” said Sigrid de Vries, ACEA director general.
“We operate within a highly interconnected transport ecosystem. To create an environment where vehicle manufacturers can thrive and meet targets, we need a collaborative effort from all stakeholders, including policymakers.”
de Vries said the challenge extends beyond the pervasive lack of charging and refilling infrastructure and requires addressing other demand-side measures as well.
He said customer demand for electric and hydrogen-powered trucks and buses still lags far behind conventional models.
“ACEA’s members have made the investments, and zero-emission vehicles are ready to go, but customers must equally have the confidence to invest.”
ACEA said policy makers have a wide toolbox at their disposal, such as purchase and tax schemes and other price signals to invest early in zero-emission models. However, their roll-out fails to match the ambition of the proposed CO2targets.
“Without enabling conditions in place, manufacturers will struggle to meet targets and face penalties while compliance largely depends on factors outside their direct control,” said de Vries.
ACEA said it welcomes that some industry concerns have been addressed, but also regrets the inclusion of ‘small lorries’ (<5 tonnes) within the regulation’s scope despite data on CO2 values not being declared in the European Commission’s Vehicle Energy Consumption Calculation Tool (VECTO).
“This unnecessary overreach will inevitably undermine the regulation’s effectiveness, as these vehicles represent only a small share of heavy-duty transport emissions,” it said.
“Additionally, the ENVI position does not insert an earlier baseline for new vehicle segments, meaning the proposed 2030 reduction target compared to a 2025 baseline – which will only be known in 2027 – is highly unrealistic.”
In response, ACEA is calling for a fit-for-purpose CO2 regulation for trucks and buses and that lawmakers address shortcomings in the upcoming plenary vote and trialogue negotiations.
“Only by holistically addressing enabling conditions and incentivising action by all stakeholders can we decarbonise transport and safeguard competitiveness,” said de Vries
“We operate within a highly interconnected transport ecosystem. To create an environment where vehicle manufacturers can thrive and meet targets, we need a collaborative effort from all stakeholders, including policymakers.”
